Narrow a biotech or pharma licensing shortlist to the assets, technologies or partners worth full diligence, with experts and customers judging the science, demand and risk.

Full diligence on the wrong candidate burns time and money, and can let the right one go to a rival.
Weak candidates drop out before they consume diligence budget and deal-team time.
Experts in the field judge whether the clinical data and mechanism hold up.
The main execution risks for each candidate are named while you can still walk away.
In licensing pharma is the practice of securing the rights to develop or sell a drug or technology that another company created. Nextyn screens a biotech licensing shortlist before diligence starts, interviewing clinical experts and target customers on each candidate's clinical promise, commercial potential and execution risk, so only the strongest go forward.

What you will knowThe candidates that pass on clinical promise, customer relevance and execution risk, ranked against each other.

What you will knowWhether the physicians, laboratories or accounts it is meant for see a real need for it, and why.

What you will knowThe main clinical, commercial and execution risks for each candidate, flagged for the diligence team.





What it settledExpert and customer interviews tested the clinical relevance, commercial potential and execution risk of shortlisted assets and technologies, creating a comparative view to focus diligence and partnership discussions.
Read the case study


Send us your question. We come back with a plan and a price. Nothing starts until you approve it.
What you need to know, which markets, and by when.
Who we will speak to, how, and what it costs. Inside 48 hours.
Nothing is commissioned until you say yes.
Every interview read together: where they agree, where they conflict, and what is still open.
In licensing pharma is the practice of securing the rights to develop or sell a drug, diagnostic or technology that another company created, instead of building it in-house. The licensee skips early discovery and takes on three kinds of risk with the candidate: clinical, commercial and execution. Nextyn screens shortlisted in-licensing candidates through expert and customer interviews before the deal, so only the strongest reach full diligence.
A Nextyn partner and asset screen delivers three outputs: a screened and ranked shortlist, expert and customer validation notes for each candidate, and risk flags to carry into diligence. Each output comes from primary interviews with clinical experts and target customers, not from desk research on the candidates or a pharma licensing deals database:
Nextyn interviews the three groups who can judge a candidate before a deal: clinical experts and KOLs, the customers the asset is meant for, and commercial experts in the target markets. The mix is matched to each candidate, so a biotech therapeutic and a diagnostic technology are each tested by the right people:
Nextyn runs in-licensing screens in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy and Spain, among other markets. Markets are agreed at scoping and follow where the licensee plans to sell, because customer demand and execution risk differ by country. Recent Nextyn work includes expert and customer interviews in Mexico that tested the clinical relevance, commercial potential and execution risk of shortlisted oncology and diagnostics assets.
Nextyn recommends an asset screen once a business development team has a shortlist and before full diligence is commissioned on any candidate. At that point the screen removes weak candidates before they consume diligence budget and deal-team time, and gives the strongest ones a list of risks to test before an in-licensing agreement is signed. There are three other triggers for a screen: an inbound partnering offer, a competitive bid for an asset, and a move into a new therapy area.
A Nextyn in-licensing screen runs in four steps, from brief to read-out, and nothing is commissioned until the client approves the plan. The client sees the sample, method and price before any fieldwork, and reads every interview with the Nextyn team at the end.
Nextyn sends a research plan within 48 hours of receiving the brief, stating which experts and customers will be interviewed, how, and what the work costs. The plan sets the fieldwork length for the number of candidates and the experts each one needs, so a three-asset screen and a broad partner scan each get their own timeline. Nothing is commissioned until the client approves that plan, and confidentiality terms, including whether the client's identity is disclosed to respondents, are agreed before work starts.
Nextyn's in-licensing screen compares a whole shortlist on clinical promise, customer demand and execution risk before a deal team commits, while full due diligence examines one chosen candidate in depth. The screen decides which candidates earn diligence, and diligence decides whether to sign an in-licensing agreement and on what terms.
| Nextyn asset screen | Full due diligence | |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | A shortlist of assets, technologies or partners | One chosen candidate |
| Evidence | New interviews with clinical experts and target customers | Data room, financial, legal and IP review |
| Output | Ranked shortlist, validation notes and risk flags | A deal decision and terms |
| Timing | A research plan in 48 hours, before diligence budget is spent | After a candidate is chosen |
Your privacy choices
We measure how this site is used and which campaigns bring people here. You can opt out at any time, which also stops any sale or sharing of your personal information for advertising.
Needed for the site to work — your session and your privacy choice itself. Always on.
How pages are found and read, so we can improve them. Never sold, never used to advertise to you.
Records how you move through a page so we can see what is confusing. Typing is masked, and the chat panel and every form are never recorded.
Lets us measure which campaigns bring people here, and show relevant messages elsewhere.