Representative engagement

They knew what merchants accepted. Not why, and not what stopped them

The client could already see payment volumes in its own transaction data. What it could not see was why merchants chose one method over another, or what was stopping them adopting new ones. So we asked them, in 28 countries.

The challenge

The volumes were there. The reasons behind them were not

The client could already see what its merchants were processing. Transaction data showed payment volumes in detail, market by market.

What it did not show was motivation. Why a merchant chose one payment method over another, and what operational, financial or customer barriers were holding back the adoption of new payment solutions.

Those answers decide product innovation and market expansion. They cannot be read out of a payments ledger, which is why this called for international market research rather than more of the transaction data the client already held.

The Nextyn approach

We asked in twenty eight countries with two frameworks, not one

Large merchants and small merchants do not make payment decisions the same way. One questionnaire would have flattened that difference, so two tailored research frameworks were built instead.

Questionnaires were localised and multilingual. That is what keeps a question asked in one market comparable with the same question asked in another.

Survey research at this scale is decided by who answers it. Quotas and structured validation held coverage comparable market to market, and more than 13,000 merchant responses were validated before they entered the dataset.

That is what turns a large sample into quantitative research a business can act on, rather than 28 separate studies that cannot be read side by side.

The outcome

Payment acceptance, read the same way in every market on the list

The study produced a consistent view of payment acceptance across merchant size, industry, revenue and sales channel.

With that in place, the drivers behind merchant choices and the barriers limiting adoption could be compared across markets rather than inferred inside each one.

A benchmarking study only earns the name if every market was measured the same way. Consistent coverage and quality control produced a reliable, comparable dataset, which is why the comparisons hold.

The client reads it as a global benchmark, comparing payment behaviour across markets and segments through executive dashboards and country level insight. That is what shows it where the high growth opportunities are and where to expand first.

Related reading

More on evidence that travels across markets, not just inside them

Recent analysis from the Nextyn Research desk.

Start here

Need one answer across many markets? We field the same question everywhere

Tell us which markets you need to compare and what decision rests on it. A named research lead replies directly.

Request a research proposal

What do you need to know?

A named research lead replies, not a queue.

We use these details to route your brief. No newsletter, no list.

Your privacy choices

We measure how this site is used and which campaigns bring people here. You can opt out at any time, which also stops any sale or sharing of your personal information for advertising.